Ask FMM: Understanding Bible Difficulties

Why are there so many contradictions in the Bible? In Matthew 10:34, Jesus says: Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. Yet, in Matthew 26:52 he then says: Then said Jesus unto him, Put up again thy sword into his place: for all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword. Is it merely a representation of Jesus’s divided nature? As both fully human and fully divine, we assume that he also possesses all of our human flaws. Does this mean that Jesus has memory loss or was he suffering from dementia? Is the Lord just as flawed as us mortals?

At times, the Bible can seem to present various “difficulties” or “contradictions”. However, careful reading and examination of the Bible can quickly clear up these “difficulties” and “contradictions”. Keep in mind that every word of the Bible and the entirety of the Bible is inspired of God (2 Tim 3:16), and that the Bible is inerrant and infallible (it cannot err or fail in its teaching). I cover the inspiration, inerrancy, and infallibility in Part 1 of my series on Essential Bible Doctrines). Two books I highly recommend reading when it comes to understanding and resolving Bible difficulties are R.A. Torrey’s Difficulties in the Bible and David O’ Brian’s Today’s Handbook for Solving Bible Difficulties.

When it comes to Bible interpretation, it is important to keep in mind the context surrounding any Bible passage. Any passage of Scripture can be isolated to be used as a “proof text” for any interpretation, whether biblically valid or invalid. As my Bachelor-level Hermeneutics professor Dr. J.B. Hixon used to say: “A text without its context is a con”. Context is key to understanding and interpreting any biblical passage. Understanding the historical context and literary/grammatical context are the two main pillars for solid biblical interpretation. One of the best books to read on this subject is Roy Zuck’s Basic Bible Interpretation. When reading the Bible, I also recommend owning a couple of solid commentaries which can help shed light on difficult to understand passages. While Bible commentaries are not inspired of God and should not be given equal authority with the Word of God itself, the Lord has blessed us with given biblical exegetes and expositors who have shed insight and understanding on biblical passages. Two good single volume Bible commentaries which are affordable are MacArthur and Moody, and John G. Butler offers one of the best multi-volume Bible commentaries if you need solid biblical exposition without being overly technical or academic.

To answer your question with regard to Matthew 10 versus Matthew 26. Matthew 10 presents Jesus speaking in the context that during His first advent to the earth in His incarnation, His ministry would stir up opposition and hostility against Him and His disciples, even to the point where His opponents sought to (and succeeded in) killing Him and later killing many of His disciples. The “sword” used in this instance is not a literal sword, and Jesus was not advocating that He and His disciples go around Jerusalem swinging swords at individuals. The “sword” used here is a metaphor, which is figurative language to denote that the first advent of Jesus would bring opposition and hostility against Him to the point of His being crucified. Roy Zuck does an excellent job explaining figurative language in his book.

In Matthew 26, the context is the garden where Jesus was being arrested to be led away to be crucified. Peter impulsively pulls out his sword to begin attempting to injure or kill those arresting Jesus to the point where he cuts off the ear of the high priest’s servant. Jesus rebukes Peter and informs him not to use physical violence against those for a multitude of reasons. One reason is that Jesus is fulfilling the mission of God the Father by dying on the cross for the sins of mankind. Second, Jesus also alludes to the biblical law of capital punishment in his message to Peter. Lastly, Jesus can at anytime invoke heavenly defense in which he wouldn’t need the swinging of Peter’s sword to defend Him. He chose not to invoke this heavenly defense in order to fulfill the mission of God the Father mentioned in the first reason.
The passages of Scripture you mentioned are not a result of a divided nature of Jesus, but rather two different contexts, plus Jesus speaking in figurative language in the first context. In terms of the nature of Jesus, I go into the Hypostatic Union well in Part 2 on my series on Essential Bible Doctrines. While Jesus is both fully God and fully man, He was not a flawed man because He did not possess a sin nature as one being born of a virgin. Jesus did not have memory loss in these two incidents, nor was He suffering from dementia. Jesus was fully God and fully man and the two natures were without mixture in the person of Jesus (the Hypostatic Union), bur Jesus was also without a flawed, sin nature since He was also born of a virgin. Had Jesus had a sin nature or was flawed in any form as we are, then He could not have been the sinless sacrifice who died on the cross for our sins.

Update: First Fruits of Zion (a Messianic Jewish ministry, Messianic Jews are Jewish believers in Jesus Christ as the Messiah) has recently released an article concerning the sword passage. Our readers can access the article by clicking here. First Fruits of Zion offers some interesting articles of some New Testament passages, as they offer a thorough examination of the first-century Jewish context that the disciples and early church would have understood these passages.

Ask FMM: Describing the Trinity

This question came to me via email from an academic website where I post my academic papers. The person who emailed me read my PhD entrance paper with regard to the Trinity (I will share excerpts from it in some future posts here on the blog). I am including his question and my response to him here for the benefit of our readers. Thanks for sending in your questions to Ask FMM, and keep them coming! We love answering them!

How would you best explain to someone the concept of the Trinity?

The concept of the Trinity as described by evangelical Christian theologians is that God eternally exists as one God (Deut 5:1) in three persons (Mt 28:19). Each of the three persons who comprise the Trinity exist with an eternal equality of essence (each of the persons of the Trinity eternally equally share in the divine essence of the Godhead) and an eternal distinction of persons (God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit eternally exist as three distinct persons in relation to each other). While the concept of the Trinity can be somewhat described by theologians (some recommended Systematic Theology resources which offer an excellent discussion and description of the Trinity include Ryrie, Grudem, MacArthur, Erickson, and Moody Handbook), the quote below by Oliphint reminds Christians that the Trinity will never be exhaustively described this side of eternity, as the Trinity is also a doctrine of mystery that causes Christians to pause in awe and wonder at such a majestic being as God.

Ask FMM: Dinosaurs and the Bible?

Recently I was asked to help with a question that I have been asked more than once and one which I myself had as a young man: what about the Dinosaurs if our Bible is true? To provide an answer and get your feet wet in seeing what the Bible says, here are my teaching notes from several years ago which are related to this topic and evolution in general:

Dinosaurs and Amazing Animals that Defy Evolution

Notes, College/Young Adult Sunday School @RaintreeChurch Dec 14, 2014

9am to 9:30am

Why is the word DINOSAUR not in the Bible?  Because it was coined in 1841 by Sir Richard Owen meaning terrible or tyrannical lizard

Why were dinosaurs’ so large? Because reptiles grow their entire lives and it is logical to conclude dinos were living 900 years or so if people were. Also, the climate was more “perfect” in the pre-flood world and had a higher oxygen content. Plus the average size of a dinosaur was that of a sheep or small pony Read more

Ask FMM: Why are there different Races?


Is there really Biblical evidence for their being multiple races of people in the world? I was asked a question like this recently. The truth is that you must redefine your question because their are not really multiple races of people. If a Chinese man marries a Caucasian woman are their children not human? Humanity is one race. The reason why we have different shaped eyes, colors of skin, and languages are because of Babel. The dispersion on mankind at Babel restricted the gene pool of different tribes which led to nations. People tend to stick around those who are like themselves and have things in common so the “races” we see today developed. For some more detail check out these articles:

Ask FMM: Luke 22:36 and Swords

I received this question recently over

I wish to ask a question which we are battling in my study group: Was Jesus really asking his followers to pick up sword in defense of their faith or what was he telling them to do with the sword he asked them to buy; according to Luke 22:36. I will love to hear your own side of view about this issue. Read more

Video: Introducing ASK FMM – Ask Us Questions

Ask Us Questions

Ask us questions

Posted by Focusing on the Mark Ministries on Saturday, March 11, 2017


Introducing Ask FMM: Send Us Your Bible Questions

At Focusing on the Mark Ministries, our ministry team continually produced biblical content through our various ministry channels (blog, podcasts, videos, social media, etc.). We pray that our biblical content is enriching your walk with the Lord and is a help to strengthen you in the Christian faith. Read more